RI.ŠI.BE: Difference between revisions
From All Skies Encyclopaedia
No edit summary |
DavidHilder (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<sup>ul</sup>RI.ŠI.BE (𒌌𒊑𒅆𒁁). These three signs follow the UL-determinative for stars on one of two diagrams on the astrological tablet from TCL 6<ref name=":0" /> 13. The reading of the term is uncertain as each of the three signs have multiple possible readings. Rochberg-Halton's statement about the term, 'UL.RI.ŠI.BE is obscure' is certainly true. |
|||
<sup>ul</sup>RI.ŠI.BE (𒌌𒊑𒅆𒁁) is an ancient Mesopotamian asterism. |
|||
==Concordance, Etymology, History== |
==Concordance, Etymology, History== |
||
=== Kurtik with Hilder, Hoffmann, Horowitz, Kim === |
=== Kurtik with Hilder, Hoffmann, Horowitz, Kim === |
||
The name of the luminary occurs only in the circular diagram in [TCL 6, 13 i; Rochberg-Halton 1987b, 224-226] in sectors I, II, IV. Perhaps it is one of the epithets of Venus; <sup>ul</sup>''Dil-bat'' stands in the corresponding position in sector II. |
The name of the luminary occurs only in the circular diagram in [TCL 6<ref name=":0">Textes cunéiformes. Musée du Louvre, vol. 6, see. TU.</ref>, 13 i; Rochberg-Halton 1987b<ref>''Rochberg-Halton F.'' TCL 6 13: Mixed Traditions in Late Babylonian Astrology // ZA. 1987. Bd. 77. S. 207-228.</ref>, 224-226, now reprinted in Rochbert 2010<ref>Rochberg, F. (2010). In the Path of the Moon. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.</ref>: 129-131] in sectors I, II, IV. Perhaps it is one of the epithets of Venus; <sup>ul</sup>''Dil-bat'' stands in the corresponding position in sector II. |
||
== Historical Dictionaries == |
== Historical Dictionaries == |
||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
Revision as of 15:52, 6 January 2026
ulRI.ŠI.BE (𒌌𒊑𒅆𒁁). These three signs follow the UL-determinative for stars on one of two diagrams on the astrological tablet from TCL 6[1] 13. The reading of the term is uncertain as each of the three signs have multiple possible readings. Rochberg-Halton's statement about the term, 'UL.RI.ŠI.BE is obscure' is certainly true.
Concordance, Etymology, History
Kurtik with Hilder, Hoffmann, Horowitz, Kim
The name of the luminary occurs only in the circular diagram in [TCL 6[1], 13 i; Rochberg-Halton 1987b[2], 224-226, now reprinted in Rochbert 2010[3]: 129-131] in sectors I, II, IV. Perhaps it is one of the epithets of Venus; ulDil-bat stands in the corresponding position in sector II.
Historical Dictionaries
| Kurtik (2022, r04) | Gössmann (1950) |
|---|---|
| название светила встречается только в круглой диаграмме в [TCL 6, 13 i; Rochberg-Halton 1987b, 224–226] в секторах I, II, IV. Возможно, это один из эпитетов Венеры; в соответствующей позиции в секторе II стоит ulDil-bat. | Example |
