Garnet Star: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(rather empty draft of this page filled with content) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Mu Cephei "The Garnet Star" 2023 (Ha and OIII).png|alt=photograph of the star in its nebula|thumb|The Garnet Star; captured 2023 in Krefeld, Germany with a Skywatcher 150/750; ZWO ASI 2600MC Pro Color and an Optolong L-Extreme filter; total exposure time of 4h (5min per single light frame), CC BY NiKo 2023]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
The name ‘garnet star’ comes from Wilhelm Herschel, as μ Cephei ([https://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-basic?Ident=mu+Cep&submit=SIMBAD+search SIMBAD]) appears garnet red in telescopes due to its spectral class M2. With 4.08 Vmag, the star is visible to the naked eye, but the eye cannot recognize the colour without a telescope because colour vision cuts off at roughly 2 mag. |
|||
==Etymology and History== |
==Etymology and History== |
||
μ Cephei became famous through observations by Wilhelm Herschel (1738 - 1822), who described it in German as "granatrot" (‘garnet red’) in 1783. This description earned the star the name ‘Herschel's Garnet Star’, in German simply "Granatstern" (without Herschels name in the star name). |
|||
The variability of the star is not mentioned by Herschel, but only suspected by J. R. Hind in 1848 and confirmed by Argelander. |
|||
==Mythology== |
|||
The description of mu Cephei as "deep red" evokes the image of a vividly red star. In fact, the star's color index (B – V) of 2.35 magnitudes makes it the reddest one visible for the naked eye (although the colour is only visible in telescopes). This intense hue is largely due to the interstellar dust between us and the star. Corresponding to its spectral type, without the reddening effect of this dust, its color index would be (B – V) = 1.71 magnitudes. |
|||
Allen (1899) writes that Piazzi in his Palermo Star Catalogue copied Herschel's name "Garnet Star". Flamsteed omits the star in his star list (possibily due to its variability), and it reoccurs in star catalogues only after the discovery of its variability. |
|||
==IAU Working Group Star Names== |
==IAU Working Group Star Names== |
||
In 2023, the WGSN discovered that [https://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-basic?Ident=mu+Cep&submit=SIMBAD+search SIMBAD] has two proper names for the star, "Erakis" and "Herschel's Garnet Star", and decided to study their history. Which of the names should be preferred? |
|||
⚫ | |||
The Arabic reading group agreed that "Erakis" is a misspelling of "Alrakis", a name which is applied to another star already (in 2017, WGSN applied "Alrakis" to μ Dra with the reason by Kunitzsch and Smart that the star name had been misapplied to this star earlier). Therefore, the Arabic alternative should be dropped. We also suggest to use the shorter (and non-eponymous) version "Garnet Star". |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
== Weblinks == |
== Weblinks == |
Revision as of 20:59, 17 September 2024
The name ‘garnet star’ comes from Wilhelm Herschel, as μ Cephei (SIMBAD) appears garnet red in telescopes due to its spectral class M2. With 4.08 Vmag, the star is visible to the naked eye, but the eye cannot recognize the colour without a telescope because colour vision cuts off at roughly 2 mag.
Etymology and History
μ Cephei became famous through observations by Wilhelm Herschel (1738 - 1822), who described it in German as "granatrot" (‘garnet red’) in 1783. This description earned the star the name ‘Herschel's Garnet Star’, in German simply "Granatstern" (without Herschels name in the star name).
The variability of the star is not mentioned by Herschel, but only suspected by J. R. Hind in 1848 and confirmed by Argelander.
The description of mu Cephei as "deep red" evokes the image of a vividly red star. In fact, the star's color index (B – V) of 2.35 magnitudes makes it the reddest one visible for the naked eye (although the colour is only visible in telescopes). This intense hue is largely due to the interstellar dust between us and the star. Corresponding to its spectral type, without the reddening effect of this dust, its color index would be (B – V) = 1.71 magnitudes.
Allen (1899) writes that Piazzi in his Palermo Star Catalogue copied Herschel's name "Garnet Star". Flamsteed omits the star in his star list (possibily due to its variability), and it reoccurs in star catalogues only after the discovery of its variability.
IAU Working Group Star Names
In 2023, the WGSN discovered that SIMBAD has two proper names for the star, "Erakis" and "Herschel's Garnet Star", and decided to study their history. Which of the names should be preferred?
The Arabic reading group agreed that "Erakis" is a misspelling of "Alrakis", a name which is applied to another star already (in 2017, WGSN applied "Alrakis" to μ Dra with the reason by Kunitzsch and Smart that the star name had been misapplied to this star earlier). Therefore, the Arabic alternative should be dropped. We also suggest to use the shorter (and non-eponymous) version "Garnet Star".
The name was discussed and approved by the IAU WGSN in 202x. μ Cephei is a semi-regularly variable star and was the prototype of the no longer used class of "mu Cephei stars".
As this star is already named ..., the WGSN chose ... (not to apply/ to apply the name to a neighbouring star/ to ...) in the IAU-CSN.