Suggested Stellar Transients: Difference between revisions
(→Compiled List from Authors of the 20th century: added several records (wording) from Xu et al. 2000.) |
No edit summary |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In the 1930s, Walter Baade and Fritz Zwicky developed the hypothesis of stars that end their lives in big explosions: supernovae. Only in the 1960s, in a series of three papers by Robert Krafft, the physical nature of novae was explained as surface eruptions on white dwarf stars in cataclysmic binary systems. |
|||
== Transients that were suggested as Novae or Supernovae == |
|||
In the 1930s, Walter Baade and Fritz Zwicky developed the hypothesis of stars that end their lifes in big explosions: supernovae. Only in the 1960s, in a series of three papers by Robert Krafft, the physical nature of novae was explained as surface eruptions on white dwarf stars in cataclysmic binary systems. |
|||
However, the term "nova" or "stella nova" was introduced by Tycho Brahe 1572 without any knowledge of the physics in stars, but just from the visual observation of a star seemingly appearing and vanishing after a while, but remaining at the same place (unlike comets). For European astronomy, this doubtless observation required a new category or label for the appearance. In contrast, East Asian astronomers already had a label for it: "guest star". Yet, this term was also used for objects of other physical nature and visual appearance, such as comets. Hence, the historical terms never imply any specific type of object. |
However, the term "nova" or "stella nova" was introduced by Tycho Brahe 1572 without any knowledge of the physics in stars, but just from the visual observation of a star seemingly appearing and vanishing after a while, but remaining at the same place (unlike comets). For European astronomy, this doubtless observation required a new category or label for the appearance. In contrast, East Asian astronomers already had a label for it: "guest star". Yet, this term was also used for objects of other physical nature and visual appearance, such as comets. Hence, the historical terms never imply any specific type of object. |
||
Since the dawn of systematic research on variable stars in the 19th century, Sinologists and astrophysicists have attempted to compile catalogues of these objects historically called "nova" (not necessarily implying an underlying nova in the definition of astrophysics) or "guest star" |
Since the dawn of systematic research on variable stars in the 19th century, Sinologists and astrophysicists have attempted to compile catalogues of these objects historically called "nova" (not necessarily implying an underlying nova in the definition of astrophysics) or "guest star". |
||
== Transients that were suggested as Novae or Supernovae == |
|||
=== Known Recurrent Novae === |
|||
As novae (in contrast to supernovae) are surface eruptions that do not destroy the source star, they may happen regularly. Only ten recurrent novae (RN, NR or N<sub>r</sub>) are known in our Galaxy. Perhaps one of the reasons is that we have only roughly 150 years of telescopic surveys, so there may be more recurrences to be discovered in historical data. |
|||
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible" |
|||
|+ |
|||
!scope="col" style="width: 5em;" | |
|||
!scope="col" style="width: 4em;" |Schaefer (2010)<ref name=":0">Schaefer, B.E., 2010. "Comprehensive Photometric Histories of all Known Galactic Recurrent Novae" ''Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series'', Vol. 187 (2), pp. 275–373. |
|||
[https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0067-0049/187/2/275 IOPscience][https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010yCat..21870275S/abstract adsabs] </ref> |
|||
! colspan="2" |Darnley (2019)<ref name=":1">Darnley, M.J., 2019. Accrete, accrete, accrete... Bang! (and repeat): The remarkable recurrent novae. arXiv e-prints. [https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.13209 arXiv:1912.13209] and on [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021gacv.workE..44D/abstract adsabs 2021]</ref> |
|||
! colspan="2" scope="col" style="width: 4em;"|Schaefer (2010)<ref name=":0" /> |
|||
!scope="col" style="width: 3em;" |Darnley (2019/21)<ref name=":1" /> |
|||
! |
|||
! |
|||
!Historical Observations |
|||
(Darnley 2019/'21)<ref name=":1" /> |
|||
!Possible Further Historical Observations |
|||
|- |
|||
!name |
|||
! colspan="2" |τ<sub>r</sub> |
|||
!Δτ |
|||
!Ampl/ mag |
|||
!t<sub>3</sub> |
|||
!P<sub>orb</sub> /d |
|||
!log<sub>10</sub> (τ) |
|||
!t<sub>2</sub> |
|||
! |
|||
! |
|||
|- |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|T Pyx |
|||
|19 |
|||
|24±12 |
|||
|12 |
|||
|9.1 |
|||
|62 |
|||
|0.07622886 |
|||
|1.4 |
|||
|32 |
|||
|1890, 1902, 1920, 1944, 1967, 2011 |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|IM Nor |
|||
|82 |
|||
|~82 |
|||
|? |
|||
|9.8 |
|||
|80 |
|||
|0.10263312 |
|||
|1.9 |
|||
|50 |
|||
|1920, 2002 |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|CI Aql |
|||
|24 |
|||
|27±4 |
|||
|04 |
|||
|7.7 |
|||
|31.6 |
|||
|0.6183609 |
|||
|1.4 |
|||
|25.4 |
|||
|1917, 1941, ( ∼1968), 2000 |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|V2487 Oph |
|||
|98 |
|||
|~98 |
|||
|? |
|||
|8.2 |
|||
|8.4 |
|||
| -- |
|||
|2.0 |
|||
|6.2 |
|||
|1900, 1998 |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|U Sco |
|||
|10 |
|||
|10±1 |
|||
|01 |
|||
|10.1 |
|||
|2.6 |
|||
|1.23054695 |
|||
|1.0 |
|||
|1.2 |
|||
|1863, ( ∼1873, ∼1884, ∼1894), 1906, 1917, ( ∼1927), 1936, 1945, ( ∼1955), 1969, 1979, 1987, 1999, 2010 |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|V394 CrA |
|||
|30 |
|||
|~38 |
|||
|? |
|||
|11.2 |
|||
|5.2 |
|||
|1.515682 |
|||
|1.6 |
|||
|2.4 |
|||
|1949, 1987 |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|T CrB |
|||
|80 |
|||
|~80 |
|||
|? |
|||
|7.3 |
|||
|06 |
|||
|227.57 |
|||
|1.9 |
|||
|4 |
|||
|1866, 1946 |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|RS Oph |
|||
|15 |
|||
|15±6 |
|||
|06 |
|||
|6.2 |
|||
|14 |
|||
|455.72 |
|||
|1.2 |
|||
|6.8 |
|||
|1898, 1907 ?, 1933, 1945 ?, 1958, 1967, 1985, 2006 |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|V745 Sco |
|||
|21 |
|||
|26±1 |
|||
|01 |
|||
|9.2 |
|||
|09 |
|||
|510±20 |
|||
|1.4 |
|||
|6.2 |
|||
|1937, ( ∼1963), 1989, 2014 |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|V3890 Sgr |
|||
|25 |
|||
|29±1 |
|||
|01 |
|||
|7.4 |
|||
|14.4 |
|||
|103.14 |
|||
|1.5 |
|||
|6.4 |
|||
|1962, 1990, 2019 |
|||
| |
|||
|} |
|||
=== Compiled List from Authors of the 20th century === |
=== Compiled List from Authors of the 20th century === |
||
Here, we collated the most famous suggestions from astrophysics papers, comment on them, and create more detailled entries for the interesting ones. |
|||
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible" |
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible" |
||
|+ |
|+ |
||
!id |
!id |
||
!year |
!year |
||
!Ho |
!Ho/ Xu+ Text |
||
!our comment |
!our comment |
||
!Xu+ 2000<ref name=":2">Xu, Z., Pankenier, D.W., Jiang, Y., 2000. ''East Asian Archaeoastronomy''. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam</ref> |
|||
!Xu+ 2000 |
|||
!Clark+Steph. 1977<ref>Stephenson, F. R. (1976), "Revised Catalogue of Pre-Telescopic Galactic Novae and Supernovae", ''Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society'', Vol. 17, p. 121</ref><ref>Clark, David H. and Stephenson, F. Richard (1977). ''The Historical Supernovae''. Oxford [Eng.] ; New York : Pergamon Press, 1977. 1st ed.</ref> |
|||
!Clark+Steph. 1977 |
|||
!Xu Const |
!Xu Const<ref name=":2" /> |
||
!Ho const.<ref name=":3">Ho Peng Yoke, 1962. "Ancient and Mediaeval Observations of Comets and Novae in Chinese Sources", ''Vistas in Astronomy'', Vol. 5., pp. 127-225 |
|||
!Ho const. |
|||
[https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962VA......5..127H/abstract adsabs], and PDF on [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0083665662900077?via%3Dihub ELSEVIER]</ref> |
|||
!Nikivorov 2010 |
|||
!Nikiforov 2010<ref>Nickiforov, Mihael G. (2010). Estimate of the Chinese astronomy development through the descriptions of nova observations, Bulgarian Astronomical Journal, Vol. 13, p. 116</ref> |
|||
!Duerbeck 199x |
|||
!Duerbeck 2008? |
|||
!Pskovskii 1972 |
|||
!Pskovskii 1972<ref>Pskovskii, Yu. P. (1972). "Survey of Stellar Outbursts of the Pretelescopic Era". ''Soviet Astronomy'', Vol. 16, p. 23. |
|||
!Xi and Po |
|||
!Hsi 1957 |
|||
[https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972SvA....16...23P/abstract adsabs] and [https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/pdf/1972SvA....16...23P PDF]</ref> |
|||
!Xi and Po<ref>Xi, Ze-Zong, Po, Shu-Jen, Yang, K. S. (1966). Ancient Oriental Records of Novae and Supernovae, Science, Volume 154, Issue 3749, pp. 597-603</ref> |
|||
!Hsi 1957<ref>Hsi, T.-T., 1957. "A New Catalog of Ancient Novae", ''Smithonian Contributions to Astrophysics'', Vol. 2, pp. 109-130. [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1957SCoA....2..109H/abstract adsabs] and [https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1957SCoA....2..109H PDF] </ref> |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|1 |
|1 |
||
| -531 |
| -531 |
||
|13th year of King Jing of Zhou, in spring. A star emerged in WUNÜ [LM 10].<ref name=":2" /> |
|||
| |
|||
| |
| |
||
|star |
|star |
||
Line 53: | Line 219: | ||
|3 |
|3 |
||
| -203 |
| -203 |
||
|a po was observed at Ta-Chio for over ten days before going out of sight. |
|a "po" was observed at Ta-Chio for over ten days before going out of sight.<ref name=":3" /> |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 81: | Line 247: | ||
|5 |
|5 |
||
| -109 to -104 |
| -109 to -104 |
||
|a po was seen at Ho-Shu |
|a "po" was seen at Ho-Shu |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 95: | Line 261: | ||
|6 |
|6 |
||
| -103 to -100 |
| -103 to -100 |
||
|a po was seen among the stars at Chao-Yao. |
|a "po" was seen among the stars at Chao-Yao. |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 193: | Line 359: | ||
|12 |
|12 |
||
| -3 |
| -3 |
||
|a po was seen at Ho-Ku. |
|a "po" was seen at Ho-Ku. |
||
|likely comet |
|likely comet |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 221: | Line 387: | ||
|14 |
|14 |
||
|59 |
|59 |
||
|a po was seen at Thien-Chhuan |
|a "po" was seen at Thien-Chhuan |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 403: | Line 569: | ||
|26 |
|26 |
||
|158 |
|158 |
||
|a po was seen at Pei-Tou |
|a "po" was seen at Pei-Tou |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 445: | Line 611: | ||
|29 |
|29 |
||
|200 |
|200 |
||
|a po was seen at Ta-Liang |
|a "po" was seen at Ta-Liang |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 459: | Line 625: | ||
|30 |
|30 |
||
|213 |
|213 |
||
|a po appeared at Wu-Chu-Hou |
|a "po" appeared at Wu-Chu-Hou |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 515: | Line 681: | ||
| |
| |
||
|<s>260</s> |
|<s>260</s> |
||
|<s>a po appeared in the east for 25 days</s> |
|<s>a "po" appeared in the east for 25 days</s> |
||
|<s>comet</s> |
|<s>comet</s> |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 529: | Line 695: | ||
|33 |
|33 |
||
|269 |
|269 |
||
|a po appeared within Tzu-Wei |
|a "po" appeared within Tzu-Wei |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 571: | Line 737: | ||
| |
| |
||
|<s>281</s> |
|<s>281</s> |
||
|<s>po appeared at Chang</s> |
|<s>a "po" appeared at Chang</s> |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 655: | Line 821: | ||
|39 |
|39 |
||
|340 |
|340 |
||
|25 |
|25 March: a "po" was seen at the Thai-Wei. |
||
|meteor |
|meteor |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 767: | Line 933: | ||
|47 |
|47 |
||
|414 |
|414 |
||
|a po appeared at the south of the Mao |
|a "po" appeared at the south of the Mao |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 781: | Line 947: | ||
|48 |
|48 |
||
|419 |
|419 |
||
|a po appeared at the western wall of the Thai Wei |
|a "po" appeared at the western wall of the Thai Wei |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 809: | Line 975: | ||
|50 |
|50 |
||
|436 |
|436 |
||
|a po was seen at the Fang |
|a "po" was seen at the Fang |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 865: | Line 1,031: | ||
|52 |
|52 |
||
|483 |
|483 |
||
|a guest star of the size of a peck measure appeared at the Shen. It looked like a po |
|a guest star of the size of a peck measure appeared at the Shen. It looked like a "po" |
||
| |
| |
||
|guest star |
|guest star |
||
Line 935: | Line 1,101: | ||
|57 |
|57 |
||
|575 |
|575 |
||
|a po appeared at Ta-Chio |
|a "po" appeared at Ta-Chio |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 949: | Line 1,115: | ||
|58 |
|58 |
||
|588 |
|588 |
||
|a po appeared at the Chhien-Niu |
|a "po" appeared at the Chhien-Niu |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 963: | Line 1,129: | ||
|59 |
|59 |
||
|617 |
|617 |
||
|a po appeared at Wu-Ti-Tso of the Thai-Wei. It was of a reddish-yellow colour and measured 3 to 4 in. (tshun). After a few days it went out of sight. |
|a "po" appeared at Wu-Ti-Tso of the Thai-Wei. It was of a reddish-yellow colour and measured 3 to 4 in. (tshun). After a few days it went out of sight. |
||
| |
| |
||
| - |
| - |
||
Line 977: | Line 1,143: | ||
|60 |
|60 |
||
|639 |
|639 |
||
|a po appeared at the Pi and the Mao |
|a "po" appeared at the Pi and the Mao |
||
| |
| |
||
| - |
| - |
||
Line 991: | Line 1,157: | ||
|61 |
|61 |
||
|641 |
|641 |
||
|a po was seen at the Thai-Wei trespassing against Lang-Wei. It disappeared on a chia-hsü day (26.08.) in the seventh month. |
|a "po" was seen at the Thai-Wei trespassing against Lang-Wei. It disappeared on a chia-hsü day (26.08.) in the seventh month. |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 1,089: | Line 1,255: | ||
|68 |
|68 |
||
|708 |
|708 |
||
|a po appeared between the Wei and the Mao |
|a "po" appeared between the Wei and the Mao |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 1,103: | Line 1,269: | ||
|69 |
|69 |
||
|709 |
|709 |
||
|a po appeared within the Tzu-Wei |
|a "po" appeared within the Tzu-Wei |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 1,159: | Line 1,325: | ||
|72 |
|72 |
||
|730 |
|730 |
||
|the po was seen between the Pi and the Mao |
|the "po" was seen between the Pi and the Mao |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 1,327: | Line 1,493: | ||
|81 |
|81 |
||
|881 |
|881 |
||
| |
|? |
||
| |
| |
||
| - |
| - |
||
Line 1,397: | Line 1,563: | ||
|85 |
|85 |
||
|902 |
|902 |
||
|... a 'guest star', of the size of a peach, appeared at the Tzu- Wci (Enclosure) beneath Hua-Kai. It gradually moved towards Yü-Nü. On a ting.mao day [2nd March] a meteor rose from Wên-Chhang and reached the 'guest star' which was then remaining stationary. On a chi-ssu day [2nd March] the 'guest star' was by the side of and guarding Kang. In the following year it was still visible." (HTS 32/8a; WHTK 294/1 la; B(1); Hsi.) |
|||
| |
|||
|comet |
|comet |
||
| - |
| - |
||
Line 1,481: | Line 1,647: | ||
| |
| |
||
|<s>956</s> |
|<s>956</s> |
||
|<s>a po appeared at the corner of the Shen with its rays pointing SE</s> |
|<s>a "po" appeared at the corner of the Shen with its rays pointing SE</s> |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 1,719: | Line 1,885: | ||
|106 |
|106 |
||
|1113 |
|1113 |
||
|a po was seen at the Ying-Shih |
|a "po" was seen at the Ying-Shih |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 1,733: | Line 1,899: | ||
|107 |
|107 |
||
|1123 |
|1123 |
||
|a po was seen at Pei-Tou |
|a "po" was seen at Pei-Tou |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 1,803: | Line 1,969: | ||
|112 |
|112 |
||
|1175 |
|1175 |
||
|a po appeared at the NW outside th Tzu-Wei and above Chhi-Kung. It was as small as Mars, but rays radiated out copiously in all directions. On a ping-wu day it went out of sight |
|a "po" appeared at the NW outside th Tzu-Wei and above Chhi-Kung. It was as small as Mars, but rays radiated out copiously in all directions. On a ping-wu day it went out of sight |
||
| |
| |
||
|fuzzy star |
|fuzzy star |
||
Line 1,846: | Line 2,012: | ||
|1210 |
|1210 |
||
|a guest star entered the Tzu-Wei. Its rays spread out like a red dragon. |
|a guest star entered the Tzu-Wei. Its rays spread out like a red dragon. |
||
|description "dragon" reads rather like an aurora but "guest star" with "red rays"... |
|||
| |
|||
| - |
| - |
||
| - |
| - |
||
Line 1,887: | Line 2,053: | ||
|117 |
|117 |
||
|1221 |
|1221 |
||
|a po appeared at Pei-Tou |
|a "po" appeared at Pei-Tou |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 2,028: | Line 2,194: | ||
|1297 |
|1297 |
||
|12.-18.+25.03. appeared at the Tung-Ching |
|12.-18.+25.03. appeared at the Tung-Ching |
||
|comet |
|||
| |
|||
(6 days in same const., after 7 days reappeared in the same) |
|||
but Kanda mentions tail |
|||
| - |
| - |
||
| - |
| - |
||
Line 2,042: | Line 2,210: | ||
|1297 |
|1297 |
||
|14.+18.09. an ominous star appeared at the Khuei |
|14.+18.09. an ominous star appeared at the Khuei |
||
|comet: always the same LM, but Kanda mentions tail |
|||
| |
|||
| - |
| - |
||
| - |
| - |
||
Line 2,266: | Line 2,434: | ||
| |
| |
||
|<s>1457</s> |
|<s>1457</s> |
||
|<s>26.10. a hui appeared at the Chio measuring over 5 (tshun) pointing north. It trespassed against the northern star of the Chio and the eastern star of the Phing-Tao.</s> |
|<s>26.10. a "hui" appeared at the Chio measuring over 5 (tshun) pointing north. It trespassed against the northern star of the Chio and the eastern star of the Phing-Tao.</s> |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 2,430: | Line 2,598: | ||
|yes |
|yes |
||
|yes |
|yes |
||
|no |
|||
|- |
|||
| |
|||
|1596 |
|||
|a hui appeared at the Tung-Ching. It was of the same size as the large star in Wu-Chhé [Capella]. On 22.08. it went out of sight. |
|||
|likely a comet |
|||
| - |
|||
| - |
|||
| |
|||
|Tung-Ching |
|||
|no |
|||
|no |
|||
|no |
|||
|no |
|||
|no |
|no |
||
|- |
|- |
||
Line 2,532: | Line 2,686: | ||
|156 |
|156 |
||
|1664 |
|1664 |
||
| |
|? |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 2,546: | Line 2,700: | ||
|157 |
|157 |
||
|1676 |
|1676 |
||
| |
|? |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 2,560: | Line 2,714: | ||
|158 |
|158 |
||
|1688 |
|1688 |
||
| |
|? |
||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 2,590: | Line 2,744: | ||
== References == |
== References == |
||
[[Category:transient]] |
[[Category:transient]] [[Category:Overviews]] |
||
<references /> |
Latest revision as of 07:11, 5 November 2024
In the 1930s, Walter Baade and Fritz Zwicky developed the hypothesis of stars that end their lives in big explosions: supernovae. Only in the 1960s, in a series of three papers by Robert Krafft, the physical nature of novae was explained as surface eruptions on white dwarf stars in cataclysmic binary systems.
However, the term "nova" or "stella nova" was introduced by Tycho Brahe 1572 without any knowledge of the physics in stars, but just from the visual observation of a star seemingly appearing and vanishing after a while, but remaining at the same place (unlike comets). For European astronomy, this doubtless observation required a new category or label for the appearance. In contrast, East Asian astronomers already had a label for it: "guest star". Yet, this term was also used for objects of other physical nature and visual appearance, such as comets. Hence, the historical terms never imply any specific type of object.
Since the dawn of systematic research on variable stars in the 19th century, Sinologists and astrophysicists have attempted to compile catalogues of these objects historically called "nova" (not necessarily implying an underlying nova in the definition of astrophysics) or "guest star".
Transients that were suggested as Novae or Supernovae
Known Recurrent Novae
As novae (in contrast to supernovae) are surface eruptions that do not destroy the source star, they may happen regularly. Only ten recurrent novae (RN, NR or Nr) are known in our Galaxy. Perhaps one of the reasons is that we have only roughly 150 years of telescopic surveys, so there may be more recurrences to be discovered in historical data.
Schaefer (2010)[1] | Darnley (2019)[2] | Schaefer (2010)[1] | Darnley (2019/21)[2] | Historical Observations
(Darnley 2019/'21)[2] |
Possible Further Historical Observations | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
name | τr | Δτ | Ampl/ mag | t3 | Porb /d | log10 (τ) | t2 | |||
T Pyx | 19 | 24±12 | 12 | 9.1 | 62 | 0.07622886 | 1.4 | 32 | 1890, 1902, 1920, 1944, 1967, 2011 | |
IM Nor | 82 | ~82 | ? | 9.8 | 80 | 0.10263312 | 1.9 | 50 | 1920, 2002 | |
CI Aql | 24 | 27±4 | 04 | 7.7 | 31.6 | 0.6183609 | 1.4 | 25.4 | 1917, 1941, ( ∼1968), 2000 | |
V2487 Oph | 98 | ~98 | ? | 8.2 | 8.4 | -- | 2.0 | 6.2 | 1900, 1998 | |
U Sco | 10 | 10±1 | 01 | 10.1 | 2.6 | 1.23054695 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1863, ( ∼1873, ∼1884, ∼1894), 1906, 1917, ( ∼1927), 1936, 1945, ( ∼1955), 1969, 1979, 1987, 1999, 2010 | |
V394 CrA | 30 | ~38 | ? | 11.2 | 5.2 | 1.515682 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 1949, 1987 | |
T CrB | 80 | ~80 | ? | 7.3 | 06 | 227.57 | 1.9 | 4 | 1866, 1946 | |
RS Oph | 15 | 15±6 | 06 | 6.2 | 14 | 455.72 | 1.2 | 6.8 | 1898, 1907 ?, 1933, 1945 ?, 1958, 1967, 1985, 2006 | |
V745 Sco | 21 | 26±1 | 01 | 9.2 | 09 | 510±20 | 1.4 | 6.2 | 1937, ( ∼1963), 1989, 2014 | |
V3890 Sgr | 25 | 29±1 | 01 | 7.4 | 14.4 | 103.14 | 1.5 | 6.4 | 1962, 1990, 2019 |
Compiled List from Authors of the 20th century
Here, we collated the most famous suggestions from astrophysics papers, comment on them, and create more detailled entries for the interesting ones.
id | year | Ho/ Xu+ Text | our comment | Xu+ 2000[3] | Clark+Steph. 1977[4][5] | Xu Const[3] | Ho const.[6] | Nikiforov 2010[7] | Duerbeck 2008? | Pskovskii 1972[8] | Xi and Po[9] | Hsi 1957[10] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | -531 | 13th year of King Jing of Zhou, in spring. A star emerged in WUNÜ [LM 10].[3] | star | star | Wunü | Wu-Nu | yes | no | yes | no | yes | |
2 | -524 | at Ta-Chhen | no | no | yes | no | no | |||||
3 | -203 | a "po" was observed at Ta-Chio for over ten days before going out of sight.[6] | fuzzy star | po | Dajiao | at Ta-Chio | yes | no | no | yes | yes | |
4 | -133 | a guest star appeared at the Fang. | guest star | k'o | Fang | Fang | yes | no | yes | no | yes | |
5 | -109 to -104 | a "po" was seen at Ho-Shu | fuzzy star | Heshu | Ho-Shu | yes | no | yes | no | no | ||
6 | -103 to -100 | a "po" was seen among the stars at Chao-Yao. | fuzzy star | Zhaoyao | Chao-Yao | yes | no | no | no | no | ||
7 | -76 | a guest star appeared at the Tzu-Wei between the star Tou-Shu and the Pole (star) | guest star | k'o | within Zigong, between Doushou and [Bei-]Ji | Tzu-Wei | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | |
8 | -75 | a candle star (chu hsing) was seen between the Khuei and the Lou. | chu | chu | ? | between Khuei and Lou | no | no | yes | no | yes | |
9 | -68 | comet? | no | no | yes | no | no | |||||
10 | -47 | a guest star of the size of a melon and with a bluish-white colour, was seen about 4 chhih away east of the second star in the Nan-Tou | guest star | k'o | four chi east of the 2nd star of Nandou | 4° away east from 2nd star Nan-Tou | yes | no | no | yes | yes | |
11 | -46 | a guest star appeared at the division of the Mao and stayed at about 5 chhih to the east of Chüan-Shê. It was bluish-white in colour and its rays measured 0.3 tshun | guest star | k'o | appeared in the space of Mao and stayed in place about five chi east of Juanshe | about 5° east of Chüan-Shê, at the division of Mao (and X) | yes | no | no | no | no | |
-4 | a hui appeared at the Chhien-Niu for over 70 days | - | ? (Steph.'76) | Chhien-Niu | no | no | no | no | no | |||
12 | -3 | a "po" was seen at Ho-Ku. | likely comet | fuzzy star | hui | Hegu | Ho-Ku | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
13 | 29 | a guest star was seen | neglect | guest star | Yuzuo | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | ||
14 | 59 | a "po" was seen at Thien-Chhuan | Thien-Chhuan | no | no | yes | no | no | ||||
15 | 61 | a guest star was seen at the NW of Kéng-Ho pointing towards Kuan-So. It went out of sight after 70 days | guest star | k'o | Genghe | NW of Kêng-Ho | yes | no | no | no | no | |
16 | 64 | a guest star with a white vapour measuring 2 chhih was seen at the south of Tso-Chih-Fa, outside the Tuan-Mén. It appeared for a period of 75 days | guest star | k'o | outside the Nanduan gate of Taiwei (Enclosure) near Zuozhifa | Tso-Chih-Fa, outside Tuan-Nén (Main-Gate) | yes | no | no | no | no | |
17 | 70 | a guest star was seen at Hsien-Yuan for 48 days | guest star | k'o | Xuanyuan | Hsien-yuan | yes | no | no | no | no | |
18 | 71 | a guest-star was seen at the Mao. It gradually went out of sight after 60 days at the right corner of Hsien-Yuan. | comet | no | no | yes | no | no | ||||
19 | 85 | a guest star entered the Tzu-Wei. | guest star | k'o | Zigong | Tzu-Wei | yes | no | no | no | no | |
20 | 101 | a small guest star appeared at the fourth star of Hsien-Yuan. It was bluish-yellow in colour. | guest star | k'o | in the space of the fourth star of Xuanyuan | Hsien-Yuan | yes | no | yes | no | yes | |
21 | 107 | a guest star appeared at the SW of the Tung-Ching and Hu | guest star | k'o | in Dongjing southwest of the Hu star | southwest of Tung-Ching and Hu | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | |
22 | 123 | identified as Biot’s mistake | no | yes | no | no | no | |||||
23 | 125 | a guest star was seen at the Thien Shih | no | guest star | k'o | Tianshi | Thien Shih | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
24 | 126 | a guest star entered the Thai-Wei | guest star | k'o | Taiwei | Thai-Wei | yes | no | no | no | no | |
25 | 126 | no | no | yes | no | no | no | |||||
149 | a hui with rays 5 ft (chhih) appeared within Thien-Shih (Enclosure) pointing SE and with a yellowish-white colour. It went out of sight on a wu-chhen day in the ninth month | comet? | Thien-Shih | no | no | no | no | no | ||||
26 | 158 | a "po" was seen at Pei-Tou | fuzzy star | Beidou | Pei-Tou | yes | no | no | yes | no | ||
27 | 173 | no | no | yes | no | no | no | |||||
28 | 185 | a guest star appeared at Nan-Men. Its size was as large as a mat, while its five colours were fluctuating. It became smaller and went out of sight during the sixth month of the following year [July/Aug 186] | SN or comet? | guest star | k'o | Nanmen | Nan-Mên | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
29 | 200 | a "po" was seen at Ta-Liang | fuzzy star | Daliang | Ta-Liang | yes | no | yes | yes | no | ||
30 | 213 | a "po" appeared at Wu-Chu-Hou | fuzzy star | Wuzhuhou | Wu-Chu-Hou | yes | no | yes | yes | no | ||
31 | 222 | a guest star appeared within the Tso-I-Men of the Thai-Wei | guest star | k'o | inside Zuoyemen of Taiwei | within Tso-I-Mên of the Thai-Wei | yes | no | no | no | yes | |
32 | 247 | a hui measuring 1 ft (chhih) appeared for 156 days at the Chen. | comet | broom star | hui | ? | Chen | no | no | no | no | no |
33 | 269 | a "po" appeared within Tzu-Wei | fuzzy star | Zigong | Tzu-Wei | yes | no | no | no | no | ||
34 | 275 | fuzzy star | Zhen | Chen | yes | no | yes | no | no | |||
35 | 290 | guest star | k'o | Zigong | Tzu-Wei | yes | no | no | no | no | ||
36 | 304 | guest star | k'o | Bi | guarded the Pi | yes | no | yes | no | yes | ||
37 | 305 | po appeared at Pei-Tou | fuzzy star | Beidou | Pei-Tou | yes | no | no | no | yes | ||
38 | 329 | po appeared at the NW trespassing against Pei-Tou | fuzzy star | po | Dou | Pei-Tou | yes | no | no | yes | no | |
39 | 340 | 25 March: a "po" was seen at the Thai-Wei. | meteor | fuzzy star | Taiwei | yes | no | no | no | no | ||
40 | 358 | a hui was seen extending from Thien-Chhuan to the Wei | meteor | no | no | no | no | yes | ||||
41 | 369 | a guest star appeared at the western wall of the Tzu-Wei. It went out of sight during the seventh month | perhaps nova | guest star | k'o | Zigong | Tzu-Wei | yes | yes | no | yes | yes |
42 | 386 | a guest star appeared at the Nan-Tou. It went out of sight during the sixth month. | SN or nova | guest star | k'o | Nandou | Nan-Tou | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
43 | 389 | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | |||||
44 | 393 | a guest star was seen within the Wei. It went out of sight during the ninth month | SN or nova | guest star | k'o | Wei | Wei | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
45 | 396 | a hui was seen at Mao-Tou. At first, a large yellow star appeared at the Mao and the Pifor more than 50 days. In winter, during the 11th month the yellow star reappeared. | Venus | star | star | in the space of Mao and Bi | Mao + Pi | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
46 | 402 | a white guest star, which resembled loose cotton was seen at the west of the Thai-Wei. During the 12th month it entered theThai-Wei. | comet | guest star | k'o | ? | Thai Wei | no | no | no | no | no |
47 | 414 | a "po" appeared at the south of the Mao | fuzzy star | south of Mao | Mao | yes | no | yes | yes | no | ||
48 | 419 | a "po" appeared at the western wall of the Thai Wei | fuzzy star | at the west palisade of Taiwei | Thai-Wei | yes | no | yes | yes | no | ||
49 | 421 | a guest star was seen at the I | guest star | k'o | Yi | I | yes | no | yes | no | yes | |
50 | 436 | a "po" was seen at the Fang | fuzzy star | ? | Fang | yes | no | yes | no | yes | ||
51 | 437 | a star appeared during the day at 15 to 17 h in the NE by the side of Tung-Ching. It was yellow in colour and was as large as an orange | meteor? or sth. with Jupiter? | star | star | ? | Tung-Ching | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
52 | 483 | a guest star of the size of a peck measure appeared at the Shen. It looked like a "po" | guest star | k'o | east of Shen | Shen | yes | no | no | no | no | |
53 | 537 | a guest star was seen at the Tzu-Wei | guest star | k'o | ? | Tzu-Wei | no | no | no | no | no | |
54 | 541 | a guest star was seen at the Tzu-Wei | guest star | k'o | in Zigong | Tzu-Wei | yes | yes | no | no | no | |
55 | 561 | a guest star appeared at the I | guest star | k'o | Yi | I | yes | no | yes | no | yes | |
56 | 568 | a guest star was seen at the east of the Ti. […] | comet | - | - | Ti | no | no | no | no | yes | |
57 | 575 | a "po" appeared at Ta-Chio | fuzzy star | - | in Dajiao | Ta-Chio | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | |
58 | 588 | a "po" appeared at the Chhien-Niu | fuzzy star | - | Qianniu | Chhien-Niu | yes | no | yes | no | yes | |
59 | 617 | a "po" appeared at Wu-Ti-Tso of the Thai-Wei. It was of a reddish-yellow colour and measured 3 to 4 in. (tshun). After a few days it went out of sight. | - | - | Thai-Wei | no | no | yes | no | no | ||
60 | 639 | a "po" appeared at the Pi and the Mao | - | - | no | no | no | no | yes | |||
61 | 641 | a "po" was seen at the Thai-Wei trespassing against Lang-Wei. It disappeared on a chia-hsü day (26.08.) in the seventh month. | fuzzy star | po | in Taiwei that trespassed Langwei | Thai-Wei | yes | no | no | no | no | |
62 | 642 | guest star | - | ? | yes | no | no | no | no | |||
63 | 667 | a hui appeared at the NE among Wu-Chhé and Pi and Mao. It was not visible on an i-hai day. | comet | - | - | among Wu-Chhé and Pi and Mao | no | no | no | no | yes | |
64 | 668 | a hui appeared above Wu-Chhé. It went out of sight on the 22nd day [7. Juni] | highly likely a miscalculated year; same as 667: comet | - | - | Wu-Chhé | no | no | yes | yes | yes | |
65 | 683 | a hui appeared north of Wu-Chhé. After 25 days it went out of sight | - | - | Wu-Chhé | no | no | yes | yes | yes | ||
68 | 708 | a "po" appeared between the Wei and the Mao | fuzzy star | between Wei and Mao | between Wei and Mao | yes | no | yes | yes | no | ||
69 | 709 | a "po" appeared within the Tzu-Wei | fuzzy star | Zigong | Tzu-Wei | yes | no | no | no | no | ||
70 | 722 | a guest star appeared by the side of Ko-Tao for a period of five days before going out of sight | guest star | k'o | Gedao | Ko-Tao | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | |
71 | 725 | fuzzy star | Huagal | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | ||||
72 | 730 | the "po" was seen between the Pi and the Mao | between Pi and Mao | no | no | no | yes | no | ||||
73 | 745 | fuzzy star | Jiangjun | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | ||||
comet | ||||||||||||
74 | 827 | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | |||||
75 | 829 | a guest star appeared at the Shui-Wei | guest star | k'o | Shuiwei | Shui-Wei | yes | no | yes | no | yes | |
76 | 837 | comet Halley with three subsequent apparitions | guest star | k'o | alongside Nandou and Tianyue | yes | no | yes | no | no | ||
77 | 839 | no | - | - | no | no | yes | no | yes | |||
78 | 840 | a hui appeared between the Ying-Shih and the Tung-Pi | between the Ying-Shih and the Tung-Pi | no | no | no | no | yes | ||||
79 | 852 | a hui appeared at the Tzui and the Shen | Tzui and Shen | no | no | no | no | yes | ||||
80 | 877 | a guest star appeared to the west of the (Tung-)Pi | guest star | k'o | ? | west of Pi | no | no | no | no | yes | |
81 | 881 | ? | - | - | no | no | yes | no | yes | |||
82 | 891 | a guest star appeared at Tung-Hsien | guest star | k'o | ? | Tung-Hsien | yes | no | yes | yes | no | |
83 | 892 | a thien-chhang was seen in the SW. On a chi-mao day it turned into a cloud and faded away | comet | - | - | no | no | no | no | yes | ||
84 | 900 | a guest star was seen at the Central Palace by the side of Huan-Ché. It was as large as a peach, while its rays extended to Huan-Ché and concealed it from view. | guest star | k'o | beside Huanzhe in the Central Enclosure (=Taiwei Enclosure) | yes | no | no | no | yes | ||
85 | 902 | ... a 'guest star', of the size of a peach, appeared at the Tzu- Wci (Enclosure) beneath Hua-Kai. It gradually moved towards Yü-Nü. On a ting.mao day [2nd March] a meteor rose from Wên-Chhang and reached the 'guest star' which was then remaining stationary. On a chi-ssu day [2nd March] the 'guest star' was by the side of and guarding Kang. In the following year it was still visible." (HTS 32/8a; WHTK 294/1 la; B(1); Hsi.) | comet | - | - | no | no | yes | yes | yes | ||
86 | 911 | a guest star trespassed against Ti-Tso | guest star | k'o | Dizuo | Ti-Tso | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | |
87 | 926 | 0 | no | no | yes | no | no | no | ||||
88 | 930 | 0 | no | no | no | yes | no | no | ||||
89 | 945 | 0 | no | no | yes | no | no | no | ||||
90 | 980 | star | Dizuo | yes | no | yes | yes | no | ||||
91 | 1006 | SN | k'o | ? | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | |||
92 | 1011 | a guest star appeared in the front of th box of the Nan-Tou | guest star | k'o | in front of the bowl of Nandou | Nan-Tou | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | |
94 | 1020 | a hui appeared between Tzung-Chéng, Tsung-Jen and Shih-Lou | between Tzung-Chéng, Tsung-Jen and Shih-Lou | no | no | yes | yes | no | ||||
95 | 1031 | 22nd year of King Hyonjong of Koryo, 9th month, day gengshen [57]. A large star entered YUGUI [LM 23]. | no (comet) | star | - | Yugui | yes | no | yes | yes | no | |
96 | 1035 | a star appeared at night at Wai-Phing. It had vaporous rays | star | star | Waiping | Wai-Phing | yes | no | yes | no | no | |
97 | 1054 | SN | guest star | k'o | several cun southeast of Tianguan | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | ||
98 | 1065 | a guest star trespassed against Thien-Miao | guest star | k'o | Tianmiao | Thien-Miao | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | |
99 | 1069 | a guest star appeared at the longitude of Chi.On 23rd July it trespassed against Chi and then went out of sight | guest star | k'o | ? | longitude of Chi | no | no | no | no | no | |
100 | 1070 | a guest star appeared at Thien-Chün | guest star | k'o | Tianqun | Thien-Chün | yes | no | yes | no | yes | |
101 | 1073 | a guest star appeared at the south of the Tung-Pi | guest star | k'o | south of the stars of Dongbi | Tung-Pi | yes | no | yes | yes | no | |
102 | 1074 | a guest star as large as a melon was seen at the south of Tung-Pi | guest star | k'o | south of the stars of Dongbi | Tung-Pi | yes | no | no | no | no | |
103 | 1080 | a hui trespassed against the Wei | comet | - | - | Wei | no | no | no | no | yes | |
104 | 1082 | 36th year of King Munjong, 7th moth, day dinghai [24]. A star emerged in Ziwei and trespassed against BEICHEN. | star | - | Ziwei; trespassed against Beichen | yes | yes | no | no | no | ||
105 | 1087 | Emperor Daozong of Liao, 23rd year of the Xianyong reign period, 6th month. A sstar like a melon emerged in WENCHANG. | no | star | - | Wenchang | yes | no | no | no | no | |
106 | 1113 | a "po" was seen at the Ying-Shih | fuzzy star | - | Yingshi | Ying-Shih | yes | no | yes | yes | no | |
107 | 1123 | a "po" was seen at Pei-Tou | fuzzy star | - | Beidou | Pei-Tou | yes | no | yes | yes | no | |
108 | 1138 | a guest star was guarding the Lou | guest star | k'o | Lou | Lou | yes | no | no | no | yes | |
109 | 1139 | a guest star guarded the Kang | guest star | k'o | Kang | Kang | yes | no | yes | no | yes | |
110 | 1163 | a guest star trepsassed against the moon | guest star | k'o | ? | yes | yes | no | no | no | ||
111 | 1166 | a guest star appeared within the Thai-Wei Enclosure at the west of the large star of Wu-Ti-Tso. Its magnitude was small and it was of a bluish-white colour | - | - | Thai-Wei | no | no | no | no | no | ||
112 | 1175 | a "po" appeared at the NW outside th Tzu-Wei and above Chhi-Kung. It was as small as Mars, but rays radiated out copiously in all directions. On a ping-wu day it went out of sight | fuzzy star | po | outside the wall of Ziwei and above Qigong | outside Tzu-Wei and above Chhi-Kung | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | |
113 | 1181 | a guest star appeared at the Khuei and trespassed against the stars of Chhung Ché. It went out of sight on a kuei-yu day in the first month of the following year, asting 185 days | SN, peculiar merger (WR, CSPN) | guest star | k'o | Emerged in the lunar mansion Kui and trespassed against the stars of Chuanshe | Khui | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
114 | 1203 | a guest star appeared at the SE within the Wei- It was bluish-white in colour and was of the same size as Saturn | guest star | k'o | Wei lunar mansion | Wei | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | |
1210 | a guest star entered the Tzu-Wei. Its rays spread out like a red dragon. | description "dragon" reads rather like an aurora but "guest star" with "red rays"... | - | - | Tzu-Wei | no | no | no | no | no | ||
115 | 1217 | no | - | - | no | no | yes | no | no | |||
116 | 1220 | a hui appeared at the NW at a distance of 1 ft to the east of Théng-Shé. It was red in colour. | fuzzy star | Beidou | east of Théng-Shé | yes | no | yes | no | no | ||
117 | 1221 | a "po" appeared at Pei-Tou | Pei-Tou | no | no | yes | yes | no | ||||
118 | 1224 | a guest star guarded and trespassed against Wei | guest star | k'o | Wei | Wei | yes | yes | no | no | yes | |
119 | 1230 | comet | no | no | yes | yes | yes | |||||
120 | 1232 | … measuring over 10 ft and was bent like an elephant’s tusk | comet | no | no | no | no | yes | ||||
121 | 1240 | a hui was seen at the (Ying)Shih. On a [31.March] it went out of sight. | (Ying)Shih | no | no | no | no | yes | ||||
122 | 1240 | guest star | k'o | lunar mansion Wei | Wei | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | ||
124 | 1245 | comet | - | - | no | yes | yes | no | no | |||
125 | 1248 | no | - | - | no | yes | no | no | no | |||
1297 | 12.-18.+25.03. appeared at the Tung-Ching | comet
(6 days in same const., after 7 days reappeared in the same) but Kanda mentions tail |
- | - | Tung-Ching | no | no | no | no | no | ||
127 | 1297 | 14.+18.09. an ominous star appeared at the Khuei | comet: always the same LM, but Kanda mentions tail | - | - | Khuei | no | no | no | no | yes | |
128 | 1299 | - | - | below Tzu + Sun | no | no | no | no | yes | |||
129 | 1313 | - | - | Tung-Ching | no | no | no | no | yes | |||
130 | 1356 | On a kuei-chhou day in the forth month of the fifth year of Kongmin Wang a guest atar trespassed against the moon | guest star | k'o | ? | yes | no | no | no | no | ||
132 | 1388 | 21st year of the Hongwu reign period, 2nd month, day bingyin [3]. A star emerged in DONGBI [LM 14]. | star | star | Dongbi | Tung-Pi | yes | no | yes | no | yes | |
133 | 1399 | 'a guest star was seen’ | guest star | k'o | ? | yes | no | no | no | no | ||
134 | 1404 | a star like a lamp appaered at the south-east of Nien-Tao. It was yellow in colour and very bright, but remained stationary | star | star | Niandao | south-east of Nien-Tao | yes | no | yes | no | yes | |
135 | 1408 | Emperor Chengzu of Ming, 6th year of the Yongle reign period, 10th month, day gengchen [17]. In the night, at the zenith, southeast of NIANDAO, there was a star like an oil-cup of a lamp. It was yeloow and shiny bright. It emerged but did not move. It was said to probably be a ZHOU BO, a star of virtue. | same as 1404?
nova event pre-merger in 18th century? |
Zhou Bo star | - | ? | yes | no | no | no | no | |
136 | 1415 | a hui appeared at the Nan-Tou | fuzzy star | - | Nandou | Nan-Tou | yes | no | yes | no | no | |
137 | 1430 | a star appeared by the side of Nan-Ho. It was as large as a pellet and is colour was dark-blue. After 26 days it went out of sight | guest star | star | more than one chi northeast of Nanhe | Nan-Ho | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | |
138 | 1431 | a star like a pellet appeared by the side of Chiu-Yu. It was yelloish-white and very bright. It disappeared after 15 days | star, Hany star, broom star | star | ? | Chiu-Yu | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | |
139 | 1437 | a guest star appeared between the 2nd and 3rd star of Wei and went out of sight after 14 days | guest star | k'o | between the second and the third star of Wei, nearer to the third star and separated from it by about half a chi | Wei | yes | no | yes | yes | no | |
140 | 1452 | Emperor Daizong of Ming, 3rd year of the Jingtai reign period, 3rd month, new moon day jiawu [31], there was a fuzzy star in BI [LM 19]. | fuzzy star | - | Bi | Pi | yes | no | yes | no | no | |
141 | 1460 | King Lishengzong, 1st year of the Guangshun reign period, spring, 2nd month. A fuzzy star appeared in YI [LM 27]. | likely a comet | fuzzy star | star | Yi | yes | no | yes | no | no | |
142 | 1461 | a star as white as powder appeared by the side of Tsung-Cheng in the Thien-Shih Enclosure. On an i-wei day it turned into a white vapour and went out of sight | - | - | Thien-Shih | no | yes | no | no | yes | ||
143 | 1489 | no | - | - | no | yes | no | no | no | |||
144 | 1497 | Emperor Xiaozong of Ming, 10th year of the Hongzhi reign period, 8th month, day guisi [30]. At dusk a guest star was observed from Nanjing beside the star TIANJI. | no | guest star | Tianji | yes | no | no | no | no | ||
145 | 1523 | Emperor Shizong of Ming, 2nd year of the Jiajing reign period, 6th month. A fuzzy star appeared in TIANSHI. | fuzzy star | Tianshi | Thien-Shih | yes | no | no | yes | no | ||
146 | 1572 | 8.11. 1572 … ahui appeared in the NE. It went out of sight only during the … 21.04.-19.051574 | SN | guest star | k'o | beside Gedao in the space of Bi | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | |
147 | 1584 | Emperor Shenzong of Mong, 12th year of the Wanli reign period, 6th month, day Jiyou [46]. a) A star emerged in Fang [LM 4]. b) On this night an anomalous star emerged in Fang [LM 4]. | star | star | Fang | Fang | yes | no | yes | no | yes | |
148 | 1592 | record from Korea | perhaps misunderstood SN reports from 1572, 1604 | guest star | k'o | Tiancang | Thien-Tshang | yes | no | yes | yes | no |
149 | 1592 | record from Korea | perhaps misunderstood SN reports from 1572, 1604 | guest star | k'o | Wangliang | no | no | yes | yes | no | |
150 | 1592 | record from Korea | perhaps misunderstood SN reports from 1572, 1604 | guest star | k'o | Wangliang | no | no | yes | yes | no | |
151 | 1600-1621, 1655 | - | - | no | no | yes | yes | no | ||||
152 | 1600 | 33rd year of King Sonjo, 11th month, day jiyou [46]. A guest star appeared in Wei [LM 6]. It was larger than the Fire Star (HUOXING) in XIN [LM 5]. Its color was orange and it glittered. | guest star | - | Wei | yes | no | no | no | no | ||
1603 | a guest star appeared at the Wei larger than Huo-Hsing in the Hsin (Antares). Its colour was yellowish-red. It was scintillating. On a ting-wei day (…) it trespassed against Venus at the Wei. | - | - | Wei | no | no | no | no | no | |||
153 | 1604 | SN | guest star | k'o | yes | no | yes | yes | no | |||
154 | 1645 | King Injo of the Yi Dynasty, 23rd year, 2nd month. A large star entered YUGUI [LM 23]. | star | Yugui | yes | no | yes | yes | no | |||
155 | 1661 | 2nd year (xinchou) of King Hyinjong, 10th intercalary month, day wuchen [5]. A guest star as large as Saturn appeared in NÜ [LM 10]. On day dinghai [24] of the 11th month it disappeared. | guest star | Nü | yes | no | yes | no | no | |||
156 | 1664 | ? | no | no | yes | yes | no | |||||
157 | 1676 | ? | no | no | yes | yes | yes | |||||
158 | 1688 | ? | no | no | yes | no | yes | |||||
159 | 1690 | Emperor Shengzu of Qing, 29th year of the Kangxi reign period, 8th month, day yiyou [22]. An anomalous star was seen in JI [LM 7]. It was yellow and lasted for two nights. | star | east of the third star of Ji; 3 du 18 fen in Wei, DE -34 du, 20 fen | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
Weblinks
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Schaefer, B.E., 2010. "Comprehensive Photometric Histories of all Known Galactic Recurrent Novae" Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 187 (2), pp. 275–373. IOPscienceadsabs
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Darnley, M.J., 2019. Accrete, accrete, accrete... Bang! (and repeat): The remarkable recurrent novae. arXiv e-prints. arXiv:1912.13209 and on adsabs 2021
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Xu, Z., Pankenier, D.W., Jiang, Y., 2000. East Asian Archaeoastronomy. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam
- ↑ Stephenson, F. R. (1976), "Revised Catalogue of Pre-Telescopic Galactic Novae and Supernovae", Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 17, p. 121
- ↑ Clark, David H. and Stephenson, F. Richard (1977). The Historical Supernovae. Oxford [Eng.] ; New York : Pergamon Press, 1977. 1st ed.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Ho Peng Yoke, 1962. "Ancient and Mediaeval Observations of Comets and Novae in Chinese Sources", Vistas in Astronomy, Vol. 5., pp. 127-225 adsabs, and PDF on ELSEVIER
- ↑ Nickiforov, Mihael G. (2010). Estimate of the Chinese astronomy development through the descriptions of nova observations, Bulgarian Astronomical Journal, Vol. 13, p. 116
- ↑ Pskovskii, Yu. P. (1972). "Survey of Stellar Outbursts of the Pretelescopic Era". Soviet Astronomy, Vol. 16, p. 23. adsabs and PDF
- ↑ Xi, Ze-Zong, Po, Shu-Jen, Yang, K. S. (1966). Ancient Oriental Records of Novae and Supernovae, Science, Volume 154, Issue 3749, pp. 597-603
- ↑ Hsi, T.-T., 1957. "A New Catalog of Ancient Novae", Smithonian Contributions to Astrophysics, Vol. 2, pp. 109-130. adsabs and PDF