Garnet Star: Difference between revisions
(rather empty draft of this page filled with content) |
No edit summary |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Mu Cephei "The Garnet Star" 2023 (Ha and OIII).png|alt=photograph of the star in its nebula|thumb|The Garnet Star; captured 2023 in Krefeld, Germany with a Skywatcher 150/750; ZWO ASI 2600MC Pro Color and an Optolong L-Extreme filter; total exposure time of 4h (5min per single light frame), CC BY NiKo 2023]] |
[[File:Mu Cephei "The Garnet Star" 2023 (Ha and OIII).png|alt=photograph of the star in its nebula|thumb|The Garnet Star; captured 2023 in Krefeld, Germany with a Skywatcher 150/750; ZWO ASI 2600MC Pro Color and an Optolong L-Extreme filter; total exposure time of 4h (5min per single light frame), CC BY NiKo 2023]] |
||
The name |
The name ‘Garnet Star’ (Latin: ''Garnet Sidus'') was given by Piazzi 1803 with a reference to William Herschel's textual description of μ Cephei ([https://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-basic?Ident=mu+Cep&submit=SIMBAD+search SIMBAD]) as "deep garnet red". In telescopes the star appears red due to its spectral class M2. The star is visible to the naked eye, but the human eye cannot recognize the colour without a telescope because colour vision cuts off at roughly 2 mag. |
||
μ Cephei is a semi-regular variable star, ranging between mags. 3.4 and 5.1, and was the prototype of the no-longer-used class of "mu Cephei stars". It is a red supergiant with an estimated diameter over a thousand times that of the Sun, one of the largest stars known. |
|||
==Etymology and History== |
==Etymology and History== |
||
[[File:GarnetStar Herschel highlightGarnet.jpg|alt=screenshot of page|thumb|description of "fine deep garnet colour" in Herschel's publication]] |
|||
μ Cephei became famous through observations by Wilhelm Herschel (1738 - 1822), who described it in German as "granatrot" (‘garnet red’) in 1783. This description earned the star the name ‘Herschel's Garnet Star’, in German simply "Granatstern" (without Herschels name in the star name). |
|||
μ Cephei became famous through observations by William Herschel (1738 - 1822), who described it in a paper<ref>Herschel, William (1783). "On the Proper Motion of the Sun and Solar System; With an Account of Several Changes That Have Happened among the Fixed Stars since the Time of Mr. Flamstead [sic]". ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London''. '''73''': 247–283. [https://doi.org/10.1098%2Frstl.1783.0017 doi:10.1098/rstl.1783.0017]. JSTOR [https://www.jstor.org/stable/106492 106492]. S2CID [https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:186213288 186213288].</ref> in 1783 listing stars that were not listed in Flamsteed's star catalogue. <blockquote>A considerable star, not marked by Flamsteed, will be found near the head of Cepheus. Its right ascension ... It is '''of very''' '''deep garnet colour''', such as the periodical star ο Ceti was formerly, and a most beautiful object, especially if we look for some time at a white star before we turn our telescope to it, such as α Cephei, which is near at hand.</blockquote> |
|||
<blockquote>(p. 257 under the headline "Stars newly come to be visible") </blockquote> |
|||
The variability of the star is not mentioned by Herschel, but only suspected by J. R. Hind in 1848 and confirmed by Argelander. |
|||
[[File:Piazzi GarnetSidus txt.jpg|alt=screenshot of page|thumb|"Garnet Sidus" in Piazzi's star catalogue 1803.]] |
|||
[[File:Piazzi GarnetSidus pageview.jpg|alt=screenshot of page|thumb|Piazzi's Palermo Star Catalogue (1803), page view with "Garnet Sidus" (p 678/679), [https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/view/bsb10485079?page=678,679 LINK]. ]] |
|||
⚫ | According to this description, Piazzi in his "Palermo Star Catalogue"<ref>Piazzi, Giuseppe (1803). ''Praecipuarum stellarum inerrantium positiones mediae ineunte seculo XIX : ex observationibus habitis in specula Panormitana ab anno 1792 ad annum 1802'', [https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/details/bsb10485079 OCLC: 643816777]</ref> named it "Garnet Star". The description of mu Cephei as "deep red" evokes the image of a vividly red star. In fact, the star's color index (B – V) of 2.35 magnitudes makes it the reddest one visible for the naked eye (although the colour is only visible in telescopes). This intense hue is largely due to the interstellar dust between us and the star. Corresponding to its spectral type, without the reddening effect of this dust, its color index would be (B – V) = 1.71 magnitudes. |
||
The star's variability was not mentioned by Herschel, but only suspected by J. R. Hind in 1848 and confirmed by Argelander. Like many red supergiants (e.g. Betelgeuse, Antares), the Garnet Star has two periods, one of 850 and another 4400 days, and it is (of course) surrounded by the nebula of its emissions. |
|||
⚫ | The description of mu Cephei as "deep red" evokes the image of a vividly red star. In fact, the star's color index (B – V) of 2.35 magnitudes makes it the reddest one visible for the naked eye (although the colour is only visible in telescopes). This intense hue is largely due to the interstellar dust between us and the star. Corresponding to its spectral type, without the reddening effect of this dust, its color index would be (B – V) = 1.71 magnitudes. |
||
Allen (1899) writes that Piazzi in his Palermo Star Catalogue copied Herschel's name "Garnet Star". Flamsteed omits the star in his star list (possibily due to its variability), and it reoccurs in star catalogues only after the discovery of its variability. |
|||
==IAU Working Group Star Names== |
==IAU Working Group Star Names== |
||
Line 16: | Line 20: | ||
The Arabic reading group agreed that "Erakis" is a misspelling of "Alrakis", a name which is applied to another star already (in 2017, WGSN applied "Alrakis" to μ Dra with the reason by Kunitzsch and Smart that the star name had been misapplied to this star earlier). Therefore, the Arabic alternative should be dropped. We also suggest to use the shorter (and non-eponymous) version "Garnet Star". |
The Arabic reading group agreed that "Erakis" is a misspelling of "Alrakis", a name which is applied to another star already (in 2017, WGSN applied "Alrakis" to μ Dra with the reason by Kunitzsch and Smart that the star name had been misapplied to this star earlier). Therefore, the Arabic alternative should be dropped. We also suggest to use the shorter (and non-eponymous) version "Garnet Star". |
||
The name was discussed and approved by the IAU WGSN in |
The name "Garnet Star" was discussed and approved for μ Cephei by the IAU WGSN in 2024. |
||
As this star is already named ..., the WGSN chose ... (not to apply/ to apply the name to a neighbouring star/ to ...) in the IAU-CSN. |
|||
== Weblinks == |
== Weblinks == |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
== Reference == |
== Reference == |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Star Name]] |
||
[[Category:Eurasia]] |
[[Category:Eurasia]] |
||
[[Category:European]] |
[[Category:European]] |
||
[[Category:IAU-Star Name]] |
Latest revision as of 02:04, 27 October 2024
The name ‘Garnet Star’ (Latin: Garnet Sidus) was given by Piazzi 1803 with a reference to William Herschel's textual description of μ Cephei (SIMBAD) as "deep garnet red". In telescopes the star appears red due to its spectral class M2. The star is visible to the naked eye, but the human eye cannot recognize the colour without a telescope because colour vision cuts off at roughly 2 mag.
μ Cephei is a semi-regular variable star, ranging between mags. 3.4 and 5.1, and was the prototype of the no-longer-used class of "mu Cephei stars". It is a red supergiant with an estimated diameter over a thousand times that of the Sun, one of the largest stars known.
Etymology and History
μ Cephei became famous through observations by William Herschel (1738 - 1822), who described it in a paper[1] in 1783 listing stars that were not listed in Flamsteed's star catalogue.
A considerable star, not marked by Flamsteed, will be found near the head of Cepheus. Its right ascension ... It is of very deep garnet colour, such as the periodical star ο Ceti was formerly, and a most beautiful object, especially if we look for some time at a white star before we turn our telescope to it, such as α Cephei, which is near at hand.
(p. 257 under the headline "Stars newly come to be visible")
According to this description, Piazzi in his "Palermo Star Catalogue"[2] named it "Garnet Star". The description of mu Cephei as "deep red" evokes the image of a vividly red star. In fact, the star's color index (B – V) of 2.35 magnitudes makes it the reddest one visible for the naked eye (although the colour is only visible in telescopes). This intense hue is largely due to the interstellar dust between us and the star. Corresponding to its spectral type, without the reddening effect of this dust, its color index would be (B – V) = 1.71 magnitudes.
The star's variability was not mentioned by Herschel, but only suspected by J. R. Hind in 1848 and confirmed by Argelander. Like many red supergiants (e.g. Betelgeuse, Antares), the Garnet Star has two periods, one of 850 and another 4400 days, and it is (of course) surrounded by the nebula of its emissions.
IAU Working Group Star Names
In 2023, the WGSN discovered that SIMBAD has two proper names for the star, "Erakis" and "Herschel's Garnet Star", and decided to study their history. Which of the names should be preferred?
The Arabic reading group agreed that "Erakis" is a misspelling of "Alrakis", a name which is applied to another star already (in 2017, WGSN applied "Alrakis" to μ Dra with the reason by Kunitzsch and Smart that the star name had been misapplied to this star earlier). Therefore, the Arabic alternative should be dropped. We also suggest to use the shorter (and non-eponymous) version "Garnet Star".
The name "Garnet Star" was discussed and approved for μ Cephei by the IAU WGSN in 2024.
Weblinks
Reference
- ↑ Herschel, William (1783). "On the Proper Motion of the Sun and Solar System; With an Account of Several Changes That Have Happened among the Fixed Stars since the Time of Mr. Flamstead [sic]". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 73: 247–283. doi:10.1098/rstl.1783.0017. JSTOR 106492. S2CID 186213288.
- ↑ Piazzi, Giuseppe (1803). Praecipuarum stellarum inerrantium positiones mediae ineunte seculo XIX : ex observationibus habitis in specula Panormitana ab anno 1792 ad annum 1802, OCLC: 643816777